223 but loaded with a 55-grain FMJ bullet at around 3,250 fps. military adopted the M193 Ball cartridge that was essentially the same cartridge as the. 223 Remington (right) shares identical outside dimensions as the 5.56 NATO (left) but is not fully interchangeable.In February 1964, the U.S. Traditionally, it propels a 55-grain bullet at 3,240 fps – a notable increase in velocity and effective range when compared to the. 223 Remington to prevent confusion, but it was not introduced commercially until December 1963 in the Remington Model 760 pump-action rifle and was soon chambered in other rifles. 224 Springfield) that had a shorter case, shorter neck and shorter overall cartridge length than the. 222 Remington Magnum in 1957-1958.Īdditional experimental cartridges were designed to function in the AR-15 and meet military requirements, including the. For several reasons, this cartridge was not accepted by the military, but Remington chose to introduce it commercially as the. 222 Remington case was lengthened, its shoulder moved forward and its neck shortened to create a new experimental cartridge that would offer greater performance and properly function in the gas-operated action. In 1957, the Armalite AR-15 rifle was in development, and the. It was the “go-to” benchrest cartridge for decades, and even produced a near-perfect five-shot group officially measured at. It offered long barrel life, low recoil and accuracy, all of which helped it establish a remarkable record of benchrest wins. It pushed a 50-grain bullet at a claimed 3,230 fps (reduced to 3,140 fps today) and quickly became popular with varmint and predator hunters. It was based on a new rimless case and filled an obvious void between the. 222 Remington in the company’s Model 722 bolt-action rifle. 223 Remington really began in 1950, when Remington introduced the. 222 Remington Magnum (center) introduced in 1957.The history of the. NOT because there better then a 308 or 06 at killing.The. The military uses them because there light, dont kick and they can carry more ammo. That said i dont know of one person that kills alot of deer that claims its an ideal round to do it. Obviously because its killed 100s of thousands of men that weight more then a deer. I take it very seriously and use the right tool for the job that puts them down without suffering. What i seen to find with the fans of 22 cal deer hunting is those people tend to forget or keep quiet about those failures or blame something else for them. You WILL eventually wound one or not recover one that you couldnt find. Now im guilty and a hypocrite because id did kill two does one year with a 60 grain partition in one of my ar's and it killed them but do it enough times and its going to bite you. Id bet not a single guy here can say his only centerfire rifle is a 223. What you can get away with isnt the same as what is right and id bet if your here you have a gun more suited for deer. If you want to kill deer with an AR get a 300 bo or some other more suited round. People do it just to prove they can and dont much care if a deer suffers. Im not even a fan of full power 556 for deer hunting. Maybe I am jaded as I have poachers in my area and this is the kind of crap they do with. We should be discouraging such endeavors, not condoning them or providing assistance. There is no good reason to harvest deer with a 1000 fps 55 gr bullet. It is very unlikely neighbors would be bothered by, or report gunshots during deer season anyway. Using a decent load is more important than keeping the noise down for neighbors. Hunting deer with a subsonic 55 gr bullet is unethical. Since I am the only one who seems bothered. I’m new to casting, not shooting and or hunting. You should give people a little more credit before you make too many assumptions. It actually worked really well with a through and through to the neck. If you had wounded the deer, with only one sub-sonic round, what was your plan?I had started with several that were given to me. Was it loaded with a cast bullet or something like the the Hornady SX? You decided to kill a deer with the one round you had. You said "I shot an axis deer with a subsonic 223 round I had picked up somewhere." Think about that statement for a minute.I am left with the impression you had one round, have no idea how it was loaded or who loaded it. Given the desire to hunt silently at close range, why not get a crossbow? A subsonic 55 gr bullet is not a good choice IMO.Ī wounded deer dying on the property of your nosey neighbors will not be well received.īTW, almost everyone else here is very .not so much.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |